At least to anarchists, the best law is no law, Sen. Panfilo Lacson said Friday.

Ping: No law is the best law for anarchists

Share on facebook
Share on google
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin

At least to anarchists, the best law is no law, Sen. Panfilo Lacson said Friday.

Lacson pointed this out amid repeated claims by some groups that it is better not to have an effective anti-terrorism measure in place.

“To the anarchist, the best law is no law,” Lacson, who sponsored the anti-terrorism bill in the Senate, said in a tweet.



In defending the measure, which he sponsored as Senate Bill 1083, Lacson pointed out the current law, the 2007 Human Security Act, is virtually useless as it is not used by law enforcers against suspected terrorists.

He noted law enforcers, deterred by a P500,000 daily penalty of a suspect who would eventually be acquitted, chose instead to file other charges such as murder of illegal possession of firearms.

But without the proper charges filed against them, the suspected terrorists are detained in “regular” facilities and could recruit other inmates to their “cause.”

Despite Lacson’s repeated explanations of some provisions of the proposed measure, some groups continued to spread disinformation about the bill, including claiming the bill allows abuse as it authorizes the Anti-Terrorism Council to order the arrest of a suspected terrorist.

“In actual fact, the ATC remains NOT authorized under this Section to order the arrest of a suspected terrorist. Rule 113 on warrantless arrest remains valid. What is being amended is Art 125 of the RPC – from 3 days to 14 days,” Lacson had said in a separate tweet.

Lacson also found himself the subject of personal attacks from opponents of the bill.

Senate Bill 1083 was adopted by the House of Representatives and has been sent to Malacanang for President Rodrigo Duterte to sign into law, or veto. The President may also allow it to lapse into law after 30 days.

Leave a Comment

POLITIKO / Live!

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on reddit
Share on whatsapp
Share on email

POLITIKO / Across the Nation

POLITIKO / Latest News

Fwd: Lokohin nyo lelong niyo! Netizens slam Sal Panelo for latest gimmick

By Prince Golez

President Rodrigo Duterte’s lawyer, Salvador Panelo, rode a jeepney Sunday morning to see firsthand how health safety protocols are implemented on public transport.

Photos allegedly taken by a commuter also showed Panelo at Agora Public Market in San Juan City.

Netizens, however, were quick to speculate that Panelo’s commuting stunt was staged.

“Stalker yung commuter? And that didn’t raise any alarm bells? Lokohin nyo lelong niyo, for all we know, the jeepney was rented and the other passengers are members of his household,” according to a tweet from @AustriaCanada.

@notinherent said: “Aga manganpanya ah. Daming time. Umabot pa sila ng San Juan eh may market naman sa Marikina.”

@mxrknoble also tweeted: “Same ata sila ng pupuntahan ng ;another commuter’ sabay na sila namalengke.”

A netizen also criticized the abogado for wearing the wrong face shield, a protective equipment that gives an individual additional protection against coronavirus disease.

“Yung face shield niya yung type na di covered yung mouth area and usually di pinapayagan papasukin sa malls – para sa mga karaniwang tao. Iba sya e! Tsk,” @StWasabi wrote.

@fly1ngstar, on one hand, praised Panelo for taking public transportation to the public market.

“Ok namn ginawa ni Sir Panelo. Mas magaan din sa pakiramdam kung subukan niyo ganyan lifestyle. Minsan sa isang linggo mamalengke at sumakay sa jeep at ‘wag puro utos sa ksambahay at palagi magarang sasakyan! Normal daily routine sa simple mamayan.”

In 2019, Panelo, who insisted that there was no mass transport crisis in Metro Manila, took four jeepneys and rode pillion after militant groups challenged him to commute from his home in Marikina to Malacañang.

Sinong sinungaling? Defensor says Yap has no Palace consent over P20B cut in military pension

Anakalusugan Party-list Rep. Mike Defensor has refuted the claim of House Committee on Appropriations chair Eric Yap that he secured the blessing of Malacañang before initiating the realignment of close to P20-billion worth of gratuity and pension funds of the country’s retired military and uniform personnel.

During Defensor’s privilege speech last Monday, the former Presidential chief-of-staff disapproved Yap’s pronouncement that he consulted the Executive branch as well as with members of the Senate and the Lower House before he re-channel the said funds to other government programs for COVID-19 response.

Yap earlier during his interpellation of Defensor’s privilege speech claimed that he secured the blessing of the Executive prior to the third reading approval of the 2021 national budget last October.

“Eto pong sinasabing P20 billion na tinanggal sa pension, eto po ay pinag-usapan ng Executive, ng Senate, at ng Kongreso. Yung P20-billion na iyon, ay hindi po inilagay sa Department of Public Works and Highways. It po ay inilagay para po sa ibang pangangailangan para sa COVID-19,” said Yap.

But Defensor was quick to refute Yap’s pronouncement, as he disclosed a latest statement coming from the Department of Budget and Management (DBM), which said that “upon submission of the national executive program to Congress, P172.9-billion was proposed under the Pension Gratuity Fund.”

The DBM under the submitted 2021 National Expenditure Program (NEP) has proposed P172.9 billion for the pension and gratuity fund but Congress only approved P152 billion, prior to President Rodrigo Duterte’s signing of the ratified budget bill in January.

“Ang tanong po dito is, was this discussed? Kasi po ito po ang binabanggit with the Executive, the Senate, and Congress? I beg to disagree, Madam Speaker,” Defensor stressed.

According to Defensor, he recently talked with top DBM officials, adding that “they were surprised after that P20 billion was taken out.”

He further elaborated that if the matter will necessitate future investigations, it would be found out that the P20-billion budget cut was opposed by the executive contrary to Yap’s claim.

Yap later during his interpellation has admitted that he bypassed Speaker Lord Allan Velasco over the multi-billion realignment, saying that he has no choice but to unilaterally realigned portions of the military pension fund, since it may only prolong the process if he consulted the matter with other members of the House leadership.

“Hindi ko po tinanong kay Speaker Velasco kung pwede po bang tanggalin ito. Ako po ay nag desisyon base sa tingin ko kung ano ang makakabuti para sambayanan. Ngayon po, siguro kung na-bypass ko man si Speaker Velasco, pero I’m sure kaya ko ginawa ‘to para po sa ikabubuti. Dahil kulang na rin po ang oras,” said Yap.

According to Yap, he unilaterally bypassed Velasco—who assumed the Speakership during the final phase of deliberations of the 2021 NEP in October—since only wanted to avert any delay which may have resulted in another reenacted budget scenario.

Last December, Yap was among the nine incumbent lawmakers tagged by President Duterte who were allegedly involved in corruption in the implementation of infrastructure projects, based on a list provided by the Presidential Anti-Corruption Commission (PACC). (CRD)

Yap admits bypassing Velasco over P20B budget cut in military pension fund

House Committee on Appropriations chair Eric Yap has admitted that he bypassed Speaker Lord Allan Velasco over close to P20-billion worth of budget cuts in the military’s gratuity and pension funds under the 2021 General Appropriations Act.

During his interpellation with Anakalusugan Party-list Rep. Mike Defensor, following the latter’s privilege speech, Yap revealed that he didn’t actually consult Velasco over the supposed slash budget being questioned by the former Environment secretary in this year’s national budget.

“Sa totoo lang po, eto po yung malaking… kaya po ako naku-kwestyon lagi dahil hindi ko po tinanong kay Speaker Velasco kung pwede po bang tanggalin ito. Ako po ay nag desisyon base sa tingin ko kung ano ang makakabuti para sambayanan,” said Yap, representative of ACT-CIS Party-list.

“Ngayon po, siguro kung na-bypass ko man si Speaker Velasco, pero I’m sure kaya ko ginawa ‘to para po sa ika-bubuti. Dahil kulang na rin po ang oras,” he added.

The DBM has proposed P172.9 billion for the pension and gratuity fund but Congress only approved P152 billion.

Yap stressed that he has no choice but to unilaterally realigned portions of the said pension funds for the country’s retired military and other uniform personnel, saying it may only prolong the process if he consulted the matter with other members of the House leadership, particularly with Velasco—who assumed the Speakership during the final phase of deliberations of the 2021 National Expenditure Program (NEP).

“Mas minabuti ko pong hindi konsultahin si Speaker nung tinanggal ko ang gratuity at pension fund. Eto po yung sinasabi ko na may mga punto sa buhay na kailangan natin gumawa ng desisyon,” the neophyte solon explained.

For Yap, he only wanted to avert any delay which may have resulted in another reenacted budget scenario.

“Isa lang naman po ang gusto. Huwag tayo magkaroon ng reenacted budget kasi po two years na tayo nade-delay pagdating sa pagpirma ng Presidente,” he said.

Yap said most of the realigned funds were channeled to various government projects for the COVID pandemic.

But based on figures disclosed by Defensor during his speech, most of its chunks were reprogrammed to the Department of Public Works and Highways (DPWH) prior to President Rodrigo Duterte’s signing of the budget bill last January. (CRD)

TRENDING NEWS

MCD MULTI MEDIA/ Network

Business News

Tagalog News

Weekly Sports News

Sign up for our Newsletter

We are a social news blog where politikos, their kin, friends and allies are the center of the universe. We write about their words and deeds, likes and dislikes, dreams and fears. We are here to entertain, provoke and hopefully inform you along the way.

Disclaimer